HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wendroth, O. Articles by Reichardt, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wendroth, O. Articles by Reichardt, K. Agricola Articles by Wendroth, O. Articles by Reichardt, K.

State-Space Approach to Spatial Variability of Crop Yield

Dep. of Land, Air, and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616

A. M. Al-Omran

Dep. of Soil Science, King Saud Univ., Ryiadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

C. Kirda

Soil Fertility, Irrigation, and Crop Production Section, Joint FAO-IAEA Division, P.O. Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria

K. Reichardt

Dep. of Physics and Meteorology, Univ. of Sao Paolo, P.O. Box 9, Piracicaba, Brazil

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Spatial crop yield variability complicates interpretation of field experiments if there is no information available about the spatial variability structure of the soil. Our objective was to determine, using a state-space approach, the underlying process in a soil that caused spatial yield variability of a N₂-fixing crop and a nonfixing crop. On a heterogeneous soil, ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) were cropped on neighboring transects. Dinitrogen fixation, calculated with either the difference method or the ¹⁵N isotope dilution method and averaged across the transects, did not differ. But, as we examined locations along the transect, differences in amount of fixed N calculated by each method became apparent. Yields of both crops showed different variability structures along the transects. Local effective soil N content was related to local N uptake from soil and to soil symbiotic N₂ fixation of alfalfa. In order to conclude this, the spatial distribution of the soil volume taken by stones in this partially rocky soil had to be considered. In stochastic (state-space) models based on spatial dependence between observations, crop yield, effective soil N, and N₂ fixation were identified as first-order autoregressive processes moving through the transect. In other cases, state-space models were useful tools for spatial interpolation of plant yield, except for large yield alterations between neighboring plots along a transect. This study showed that the spatial variability structure of yields could be explained from located field observations combined with state-space models.

Contribution of the Dep. of Land, Air and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis.

Received for publication June 3, 1991.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Wendroth, S. Koszinski, and E. Pena-Yewtukhiv Spatial Association among Soil Hydraulic Properties, Soil Texture, and Geoelectrical Resistivity Vadose Zone J., March 8, 2006; 5(1): 341 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Si and R. E. Farrell Scale-Dependent Relationship between Wheat Yield and Topographic Indices: A Wavelet Approach Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2004; 68(2): 577 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Li, R. J. Lascano, J. Booker, L. T. Wilson, K. F. Bronson, and E. Segarra State-Space Description of Field Heterogeneity: Water and Nitrogen Use in Cotton Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2002; 66(2): 585 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.K. Cassel, O. Wendroth, and D.R. Nielsen Assessing Spatial Variability in an Agricultural Experiment Station Field: Opportunities Arising from Spatial Dependence Agron. J., July 1, 2000; 92(4): 706 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A.D. Hartkamp, J. W. White, and G. Hoogenboom Interfacing Geographic Information Systems with Agronomic Modeling: A Review Agron. J., September 1, 1999; 91(5): 761 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text]