SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:531-539 (1992)
© 1992 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stolt, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stolt, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, T. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stolt, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, T. W.

Characterization and Genesis of Saprolite Derived from Gneissic Rocks of Virginia

M. H. Stolt*, J. C. Baker and T. W. Simpson

Contribution of the Dep. of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061-0404

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Saprolite is the most prevalent soil parent material in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Highlands regions of Virginia. Soil-saprolite-land-scape associations were examined in these regions in order to describe and characterize saprolite formed from gneissic rocks, and to study saprolite genesis on these landscapes. Three representative landscape associations were chosen as study sites, and soil and saprolite were examined at the summit, backslope, and footslope positions of each. Saprolite thickness decreased from summit to footslope. Greater thicknesses of saprolite at summits are apparently related to the relative stability of this position compared with associated backslopes and footslopes. Reconstruction results indicate that between 20 and 36% of the mass of the partially weathered rock, which is the precursor of saprolite, is lost during saprolite formation. From 73 to 82% of these losses are Al or Si. Initial soil formation occurs at a faster rate than saprolite formation. As profile development increases, the rate of soil formation and consequent increase in solum thickness is reduced. After soil formation is reduced to a rate below that of saprolite formation, and chemical weathering controls the rate at which the thickness of the regolith increases, saprolite begins to accumulate below the solum.

Received for publication April 17, 1991.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
C. S. Frazier, C. S. Frazier, R. C. Graham, P. J. Shouse, M. V. Yates, and M. A. Anderson
A Field Study of Water Flow and Virus Transport in Weathered Granitic Bedrock
Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2002; 1(1): 113 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the Soil Science Society of America.