HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tyler, S. W. Articles by Wheatcraft, S. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Tyler, S. W. Articles by Wheatcraft, S. W. Agricola Articles by Tyler, S. W. Articles by Wheatcraft, S. W.

Fractal Scaling of Soil Particle-Size Distributions: Analysis and Limitations

Desert Research Inst., Univ. of Nevada System, 7010 Dandini Blvd., Reno, NV 89506

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Fractal scaling has recently been proposed as a model for soil particle-size distribution (PSD). In this work, the cumulative number of soil grains greater than a characteristic size, N(R > r), and the cumulative mass distribution, M(r < R), are developed and shown to be proportional to R^3-D and R^3-D, respectively, where r is the grain size, R is a specific measuring scale, and D is the fractal dimension. The cumulative-number approach to estimate D is shown to be sensitive to the assumed grain density and characteristic size, while the mass distribution is less sensitive to the assumed grain density and characteristic size, and therefore more appropriate for the analysis of field soils. These two models of fractal PSD behavior also constrain the fractal dimension to lie between 0 and 3 for field soils. With constraints on the fractal dimension, soils displaying strict fractal scaling in grain-size distribution are shown to be a rather small subset of those soils commonly encountered in the field. Earlier work has shown fractal scaling in many soil PSDs with fractal dimensions exceeding 3.0 using the number-based analysis. The fractal scaling and magnitude of the fractal dimensions found in previous work are shown to be an artifact of the plotting algorithms and assumptions on grain density and size. Although fractal scaling plays an important role in soil water retention and porosity, PSD data alone are not sufficient to fully characterize this scaling.

Received for publication October 8, 1990.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Martin and C. Garcia-Gutierrez LOG SELFSIMILARITY OF CONTINUOUS SOIL PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS ESTIMATED USING RANDOM MULTIPLICATIVE CASCADES Clays and Clay Minerals, June 1, 2008; 56(3): 389 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. R. Filgueira, Y. A. Pachepsky, and L. L. Fournier TIME-MASS SCALING IN SOIL TEXTURE ANALYSIS Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2003; 67(6): 1703 - 1706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Zobeck, T. W. Popham, E. L. Skidmore, J. A. Lamb, S. D. Merrill, M. J. Lindstrom, D. L. Mokma, and R. E. Yoder Aggregate-Mean Diameter and Wind-Erodible Soil Predictions Using Dry Aggregate-Size Distributions Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2003; 67(2): 425 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. D. Posadas, D. Gimenez, M. Bittelli, C. M. P. Vaz, and M. Flury Multifractal Characterization of Soil Particle-Size Distributions Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2001; 65(5): 1361 - 1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. H. Skaggs, L. M. Arya, P. J. Shouse, and B. P. Mohanty Estimating Particle-Size Distribution from Limited Soil Texture Data Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2001; 65(4): 1038 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bittelli, G. S. Campbell, and M. Flury Characterization of Particle-Size Distribution in Soils with a Fragmentation Model Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 1999; 63(4): 782 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text]