SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:745-750 (1991)
© 1991 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schnitzer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ripmeester, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schnitzer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ripmeester, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schnitzer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ripmeester, J. A.

Determination of the Aromaticity of Humic Substances by X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

M. Schnitzer* and H. Kodama

Land Resource Centre, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6

J. A. Ripmeester

Chemistry Division, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0R9, Canada

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Aromaticity is an important indicator of the origin, stability, and chemical reactivity of soil humic materials. The only method available at the present time for measuring the aromaticity of these materials is 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), so that there exists a need for an alternate, independent method. With this in mind, we developed a method based on the x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of humic materials. Total areas in XRD patterns are subdivided into areas due to G (aromatic) and {gamma} (aliphatic) bands. The G-band area, expressed as a percent of the total area, is assumed to be a measure of the aromaticity. The method was tested on 14 natural humic acids, one natural fulvic acid, and one synthetic humic acid. Aromaticities so measured were then compared with aromaticities computed from 13C-NMR spectra. The agreement between the two methods was acceptable. This establishes the XRD method as a valid alternative to the 13C-NMR method.


NOTES

Contribution no. 90-43. LRRC.

Received for publication June 25, 1990.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1991 by the Soil Science Society of America.