SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:451-459 (1991)
© 1991 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chichester, F. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hauser, V. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chichester, F. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hauser, V. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chichester, F. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hauser, V. L.

Change in Chemical Properties of Constructed Minesoils Developing under Forage Grass Management

F. W. Chichester* and Victor L. Hauser

USDA-ARS, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, TX 76502

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

There is a need to better understand the effects of selection, placement, and management of coal-overburden materials on subsequent development and agricultural productivity of constructed minesoils. This field study sought to determine chemical changes that occurred in several minesoils during the early stages of soil formation and to evaluate these changes relative to the continued suitability of the soils for cropping. Four constructed minesoil profiles were compared with an undisturbed Axtell fine sandy loam (fine, montmorillonitic, thermic Udertic Paleustalf). The minesoil profile configurations included a 1.8-m depth of low-pyrite dragline spoil, and 0.3, 0.6, and 1.2 m of mixed Axtell soil placed over 1.5, 1.2, and 0.6 m of spoil, respectively. Kleingrass (Panicum coloratum L.) was established on each soil and harvested periodically. Soil materials were sampled for chemical analysis at construction in 1980 and again in 1986. Changes in profile chemistry of the undisturbed Axtell soil were attributed mainly to increased management. Changes in the minesoils were also strongly influenced by weathering processes. Incorporation of fertilized crop residues increased total C, N, and P and extractable N and P, particularly in the near-surface layers of all profiles. Both fossil C and pH decreased in the minespoil. Electrical conductivity increased with depth as salts leached from the surface soil. Differences in minesoil configuration caused differences in the magnitude and direction of chemical change during the 6-yr study period. While there were year-to-year differences in total forage yield due to variation in water stress, negative effects of chemical properties on crop growth were not generally evident. Crop production was, in fact, greater for the last harvest than for any preceding harvest since stand establishment.


NOTES

Contribution of the USDA-ARS in cooperation with Shell Mining Co., Houston, TX, under Cooperative Agreement no. 58-7B30-2-453.

Received for publication April 30, 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geochem.Home page
R. Borden
Geochemical evolution of sulphide-bearing waste rock soils at the Bingham Canyon Mine, Utah
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, February 1, 2001; 1(1): 15 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1991 by the Soil Science Society of America.