SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:96-102 (1991)
© 1991 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Novak, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smeck, N.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Novak, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smeck, N.E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Novak, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smeck, N.E.

Comparisons of Humic Substances Extracted from Contiguous Alfisols and Mollisols of Southwestern Ohio

J. M. Novak*

Savannah River Ecology Lab., Drawer E., Aiken, SC 29801

N.E. Smeck

Dep. of Agronomy, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Humic and fulvic acids extracted from contiguous Alfisols and Mollisols were characterized to determine if any dissimilarities could be documented between humic substances extracted from soils formed under nearly identical environmental conditions, but belonging to different taxonomic classes. Comparisons of humic substances from two Alfisol-Mollisol pairs, one from the Wisconsinan and one from the Illinoian till plain of southwestern Ohio, were based on wet chemical, infrared, and 13C cross-polarization magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (CPMAS NMR) spectroscopy studies. Using 0.1 M NaOH, more humic substances were extracted from the Mollisols than the Alfisols, with the majority being humic acids. Small amounts of fulvic acids were recovered from all pedons. Data from infrared and 13C CPMAS NMR spectroscopy indicate that humic acids from both the Alfisols and Mollisols are dominated by alkyl-substituted aromatic structures, followed by aliphatic, O-substituted alkyl, carboxylic acid, and small amounts of carbonyl structures. Whereas 13C NMR spectroscopy data suggest Mollisol humic acids contain higher aromatic and carboxylic acid contents than those of the Alfisols, Alfisol humic acid spectra show more evidence for phenolic-OH groups and lignin and lignin-like products than those of the Mollisols. Fulvic acids from Alfisols and Mollisols contained mostly aliphatic, O-substituted alkyl, and carboxylic acid, followed by aromatic groups and small amounts of carbonyl groups. The proportion of nonaromatic and aromatic structures in the fulvic acids of the Alfisols and Mollisols was similar, but slight differences were noted in elemental ratios and 13C NMR spectra. Although only minimal differences were noted among fulvic acids, differences were evident in the chemical and structural properties of humic acids from contiguous Alfisols and Mollisols in southwestern Ohio.


NOTES

Salaries and research support provided by state and federal funds appropriated to the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State Univ. Ohio State Journal no. 240-89.

Received for publication February 26, 1990.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1991 by the Soil Science Society of America.