SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:285-287 (1991)
© 1991 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bergström, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Persson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bergström, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Persson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bergström, L.

Drilling Method for Collection of Undisturbed Soil Monoliths

L. Persson

Dep. of Soil Sciences, Div. of Agricultural Hydrotechnics, Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, P. O. Box 7014

L. Bergström*

Dep. of Soil Sciences, Div. of Water Management, Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7072, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

In studies of water and solute movement in soils, use of undisturbed monoliths is usually preferred. A drilling technique to collect such monoliths (0.295 m i.d.; 1.0, 0.5, or 0.3 m in length) with minimal soil disturbance was developed. The drill consists of a steel cylinder with four mounted cutting teeth at the bottom, into which a plastic casing is inserted. The drill-cylinder rotates around the casing and carves out a soil core that is gently pushed into the casing using only a minimum of hydraulic pressure. The technique has been used in a wide variety of research applications within soil science, including the measurement of hydraulic properties, soil evaporation, and soil aeration studies. Here, one application is described in which the monoliths were used as field lysimeters planted with either barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) or meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Hudson). During a 6-mo period, the grass lysimeters had a much lower total drainage (106 compared with 213 mm for barley) and also lower mean NO3 concentrations in the drainage water (<0.1 compared with 9.3 mg N L–1). The uniformity of response among the replicates and large differences between the two treatments was taken as indirect evidence that sidewall flows were of little significance when using this technique.

Received for publication January 22, 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. Bergstrom and H. Kirchmann
Leaching and Crop Uptake of Nitrogen from Nitrogen-15-Labeled Green Manures and Ammonium Nitrate
J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2004; 33(5): 1786 - 1792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
F. Djodjic, K. Borling, and L. Bergstrom
Phosphorus Leaching in Relation to Soil Type and Soil Phosphorus Content
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2004; 33(2): 678 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. F. Bergstrom and W. E. Jokela
Ryegrass Cover Crop Effects on Nitrate Leaching in Spring Barley Fertilized with 15NH415NO3
J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2001; 30(5): 1659 - 1667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1991 by the Soil Science Society of America.