SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1377-1384 (1990)
© 1990 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chopart, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Vauclin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chopart, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Vauclin, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chopart, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Vauclin, M.

Water Balance Estimation Model: Field Test and Sensitivity Analysis

J. L. Chopart

Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement/Institut de Recherches Agronomiques Tropicales et des Cultures Vivrières, BP 635, Bouake, Ivory Coast

M. Vauclin*

Inst. de Mécanique de Grenoble, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cédex, France

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

A simplified, capacity-based simulation model has been developed to predict components of the field water balance. This requires only daily information such as the atmosphere evaporative demand and soil-wetting events, maximum available soil water storage, and root growth characteristics, as well as crop and soil parameters. Actual evapotranspiration was modeled using Eagleman's parameterization. The model was tested for upland rice grown on a 3500-m2 field plot, and on an undisturbed lysimeter. The predicted actual evapotranspiration (AET) and drainage (D) at the bottom of the soil profile matched the lysimeter data. Also, the model predicted reasonably well the field soil water content data, which were obtained at 15 sites. In the latter case, the root mean square error was about 16% for the seasonal AET, and 19% for D. Errors were within the limits of experimental uncertainties expected when such measurements are analyzed by Darcy's law. The results of a sensitivity analysis with respect to changes in parameter inputs show that the model is physically realistic. However, the sensitivity depends strongly on the supply of water in the soil. This clearly justifies the need to simulate the root-zone water balance as a time-dependent process, especially if there is a practical interest in accurate prediction during drought periods.


NOTES

Contribution from Inst. des Savannes, Dep. Cultures Vivrières, Ivory Coast.

Received for publication December 22, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
H. Bernard, P. F. Chabalier, J. L. Chopart, B. Legube, and M. Vauclin
Assessment of Herbicide Leaching Risk in Two Tropical Soils of Reunion Island (France)
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2005; 34(2): 534 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
K.R. Brye, J.M. Norman, L.G. Bundy, and S.T. Gower
Water-Budget Evaluation of Prairie and Maize Ecosystems
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2000; 64(2): 715 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. Fares and A.K. Alva
Soil Water Components Based on Capacitance Probes in a Sandy Soil
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2000; 64(1): 311 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1990 by the Soil Science Society of America.