HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tanner, C. B. Articles by Shen, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Tanner, C. B. Articles by Shen, Y. Agricola Articles by Tanner, C. B. Articles by Shen, Y.

Water Vapor Transport through a Flail-Chopped Corn Residue

Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Crop residue at the soil surface is known to decrease evaporation, and measurements have shown that wind increases evaporative loss through residues; however, to our knowledge, measurements of water vapor flux through residues have not defined their vapor conductance. The objective of this study was to measure the water vapor transport through crop residues in a wind tunnel and under natural wind and to parameterize the vapor conductance in a way useful for modeling the energy balance of conservation-tillage systems. The vapor conductance of flail-chopped corn (Zea mays L.) residue laid over large vapor sources (0.15 by 1.2 m) at different vapor-pressure gradients was measured in still air and under winds. In still air, the vapor conductance of 10 samples of residue (areal density = 0.4 kg m^–2; average thickness = 11 mm) averaged 2.2 mm s^–1 at 20 °C and was not significantly different than the conductance of a similar thickness of air. Error in the measurement (CV = 13%) was sufficient that porosity and tortuosity effects on conductance could not be determined. Buoyancy-driven convection in the flail-chopped residue was negligible under much greater buoyancy instabilities than are likely to occur in the field. The vapor conductance (h) of nine samples of residue measured in a wind tunnel increased linearly with wind speed (V) measured at 1 m above the residue: h = (2.2 mm s^–1) (1 + 0.89V), with a standard error of estimate (S_yx) of 1.82 mm s^–1. The regression coefficients of vapor conductance vs. wind found in the wind tunnel and under natural winds did not differ at P = 0.25. Based on our experience, measurements of conductance of other residues would be done much more easily in a suitable wind tunnel than in the field, and with the same results.

Research supported by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Hatch formula funds (Project 142-2888) and USDA Specific Cooperative Agreement 58-5759-5-3.

Received for publication October 4, 1989.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Fujimaki, T. Shimano, M. Inoue, and K. Nakane Effect of a Salt Crust on Evaporation from a Bare Saline Soil Vadose Zone J., November 20, 2006; 5(4): 1246 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Aiken, D. C. Nielsen, and L. R. Ahuja Scaling Effects of Standing Crop Residues on the Wind Profile Agron. J., July 1, 2003; 95(4): 1041 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]