SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:321-326 (1990)
© 1990 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. A.

Calculating Confidence Intervals for the Mean of a Lognormally Distributed Variable

T. B. Parkin*, S. T. Chester and J. A. Robinson

USDA-ARS, Environmental Chemistry Lab., Bldg. 008, Room 102, BARC-West, Beltsville, MD 20705

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Many physical, chemical, and biological properties of soils exhibit skewed distributions that can be approximated by the two-parameter lognormal distribution. Recent attention in the soils literature has focused on the best method of estimating the mean for lognormally distributed variables; however, little attention has been given to methods for constructing confidence intervals about the mean of such variables. This paper reports on the efficacy of five different methods, one exact and four approximate, for constructing confidence intervals about the mean of a lognormally distributed variable. These methods were examined over a range of sample sizes (n = 6–100) by using Monte Carlo simulation to draw samples from four lognormal distributions with known mean and variances (coefficients of variation of 50, 100, 200, and 500%). Performance of the confidence-interval methods were assessed by identifying how close the calculated probability levels for the upper and lower confidence limits came to the stated probability levels. Two commonly applied methods, the asymptotic and Patterson's methods, failed to provide accurate probabilistic coverage. A nonparametric method developed by the authors was superior to both of these methods and compared favorably with Land's method in some cases. The latter is an exact method that gives the correct probabilistic coverage. The third method, attributed to Cox, was generally inferior to Land's and our nonparametric method, although it outperformed the asymptotic and Patterson's methods. For precise work, Land's method should be employed for constructing confidence intervals about the mean of a lognormally distributed variable.


NOTES

Contribution from the USDA-ARS, Environmental Chemistry Lab. and The Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, MI.

Received for publication January 27, 1989.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Sterba, L. Dusek, R. Demlova, and D. Valik
Pretreatment Plasma Folate Modulates the Pharmacodynamic Effect of High-Dose Methotrexate in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: "Folate Overrescue" Concept Revisited
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2006; 52(4): 692 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1990 by the Soil Science Society of America.