SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:15-18 (1989)
© 1989 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sadeghi, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cabrera, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sadeghi, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cabrera, M. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sadeghi, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cabrera, M. L.

Estimating Molecular Diffusion Coefficients of Urea in Unsaturated Soil

A. M. Sadeghi, D. E. Kissel* and M. L. Cabrera

Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

A correct value for the molecular diffusion coefficient of urea in soil (Ds) is required to accurately predict urea movement in soil by molecular diffusion. In previous work, to estimate Ds in a simulation model of urea diffusion, we used an empirical equation of Papendick and Campbell that describes Ds for a dissolved species in soil to be a product of a tortuosity factor squared, the species diffusion coefficient in water (Dw), and the volumetric water content. Comparisons of measured and computed urea concentration with depth indicated that this equation was not adequately general over a wide range of soils. The objective of this study was to modify the parameters in the equation and, if necessary, develop a new relationship to estimate the value of Ds in soils. Laboratory studies were conducted on seven soils in which the clay content ranged from 10 to 51%. Urea concentrations with depth at 48 h following surface-application were measured and also computed using numerical techniques with an initial estimate for Ds instead of computing it using Papendick and Campbell's equation. The Ds was modified incrementally, until the difference between computed and measured concentrations was minimized. In all seven soils, good agreement was obtained between measured and computed urea concentrations with depth. The maximum depth of urea movement occurred in Kahola soil (approx. 3.5-cm deep), whereas least movement occurred in Crete soil (approx. 2.6-cm deep). Nonlinear regression analysis gave a better relationship (Ds = 0.18 x Dw ({Theta}v/porosity)2.98, R2 = 0.88) when relative water content ({Theta}v/porosity) of the seven soils was substituted for the volumetric water content (Ds = 0.73 x Dw ({Theta}v)2.58, R2 = 0.66) in Papendick and Campbell's equation.


NOTES

Contribution no. 88-359-J, from the Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn. This study was supported by a grant from Farmland Industries, Kansas City, MO.

Received for publication February 12, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. Agehara and D. D. Warncke
Soil Moisture and Temperature Effects on Nitrogen Release from Organic Nitrogen Sources
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 29, 2005; 69(6): 1844 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the Soil Science Society of America.