SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:1228-1234 (1988)
© 1988 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russo, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jury, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Russo, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jury, W. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Russo, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jury, W. A.

Effect of the Sampling Network on Estimates of the Covariance Function of Stationary Fields

David Russo*

Div. of Soil Physics, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel

William A. Jury

Dep. of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The covariance function of the stochastic component of various soil properties plays an essential role in the estimation and interpolation of spatial phenomena using kriging techniques and in the solution of transport problems in heterogeneous media using stochastic continuum transport modeling. In this study the effect of the sampling network on the estimates of covariance functions of two-dimensional, isotropic, second-order stationary processes, characterized by different underlying correlation scales, was analyzed. Estimates of the covariance function based on a standard systematic sampling network were compared with estimates of the covariance functions based on a modified sampling network. Results of these comparisons showed that the modified sampling network was better suited than the systematic network to resolving the statistical properties of the underlying stochastic process at small separation distances. This may result in an improvement in structure identification. Analyses of the effect of the sampling network used for estimating the covariance function on the results of conditional inference procedures such as kriging showed that the kriging estimates were essentially insensitive to the geometric configuration of the sampling network. Uncertainties about these estimates were reduced when using the modified sampling network, however. In the case of unconditional inferences, such as with stochastic analyses of transport problems in heterogeneous media, predictions of the head variance provided by using estimates of the parameters of the covariance function of the log saturated hydraulic conductivity based on the modified sampling network fit the theoretical head variance better than those based on the systematic sampling network. The effect of the sampling network used for estimating the covariance function on the predicted head variance was significant, particularly when the underlying correlation scale was relatively small, when the porous medium texture became finer, and when the hydraulic conductivity variations were treated as being three-dimensional.

Received for publication August 18, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the Soil Science Society of America.