SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1571-1575 (1987)
© 1987 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Remley, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Remley, P. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Remley, P. A.

Interrill Soil Erosion Processes: II. Relationship of Splash Detachment to Soil Properties1

J. M. Bradford, J. E. Ferris and P. A. Remley2

ABSTRACT

Soil erodibility is often estimated using predictive equations based on easily measurable soil parameters. However, most predictive equations are valid for a limited group of soils and do not account for temporal changes in surface conditions. The objective of this study was to identify those soil properties that affect interrill splash and to develop an interrill detachment model based on both static and dynamic soil properties. Twenty soils ranging in texture from sand to clay were exposed to laboratory simulated rainfall with an intensity of about 63 mm/h. The development of a surface seal decreased infiltration rate, splash, wash erosion, and increased soil strength, as measured with a fall-cone device. The best predictor of soil splash for the surface sealed condition was a combined kinetic energy/fall- cone strength (KE/{tau}) and total silt content term, and of total soil loss, a KE/{tau} and coarse silt content term. Comparing results from this study with previously reported studies, we conclude that for improvement of laboratory based indices, greater attention must be given to dynamic soil properties such as the soil's resisting force to raindrop impact and surface flow.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the USDA-ARS, National Soil Erosion Res. Lab., West Lafayette, IN, in cooperation with the Purdue Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal no. 11006.

2 Soil Scientists, USDA-ARS, and Research Associate, Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907.

Received for publication December 29, 1986.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. M. Bresson, C. Koch, Y. Le Bissonnais, E. Barriuso, and V. Lecomte
Soil Surface Structure Stabilization by Municipal Waste Compost Application
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2001; 65(6): 1804 - 1811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Soil Science Society of America.