SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1501-1508 (1987)
© 1987 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marion, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Black, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marion, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Black, C. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marion, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Black, C. H.

The Effect of Time and Temperature on Nitrogen Mineralization in Arctic Tundra Soils1

G. M. Marion and C. H. Black2

ABSTRACT

The objective of this work was to evaluate several mathematical models for describing N mineralization in three arctic tundra soils (Histic Pergelic Cryaquepts) as functions of time and temperature. Intact soil cores were collected in the field and incubated in a laboratory at 5, 15, 25, and 35 °C for 11 weeks. The exponential equation fit the data well at 35 °C but was generally unsuited for describing N mineralization at lower temperatures. The parabolic equation better fit the N mineralization data than the exponential equation except in a few cases where the data appeared to be approaching an asymptote. The parameters of the parabolic equation did not follow simple trends with respect to temperature, however, which made interpolating between experimental temperatures difficult. A second-order polynomial equation with respect to both time and temperature was evaluated. This empirical equation gave R2 >0.98 in all but one case. The major advantages of the empirical, polynomial equation are that it assumes little about the nature of the N mineralization process, it is flexible, and it is accurate. The temperature data did not follow the Arrhenius relationship nor have a simple overall Q10 value because the mineralization rates at different temperatures did not follow similar trends with respect to time. Only a small fraction of the N that is potentially mineralizable is likely to be mineralized under the prevailing cold temperatures of these arctic soils.


NOTES

1 Contribution from San Diego State Univ.

2 Research Soil Scientists, Systems Ecology Research Group, San Diego State Univ., San Diego, CA 92182.

Received for publication March 11, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Soil Science Society of America.