SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1113-1121 (1987)
© 1987 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lascano, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Upchurch, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lascano, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Upchurch, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lascano, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Upchurch, D. R.

Energy and Water Balance of a Sparse Crop: Simulated and Measured Soil and Crop Evaporation1

R. J. Lascano, C. H. M. van Bavel, J. L. Hatfield and D. R. Upchurch2

ABSTRACT

Dryland crops grown in semiarid environments often do not completely cover the soil, leaving a portion of the soil surface exposed to a condition of rapid soil-water evaporation. Quantitative separation of soil evaporation and crop transpiration is important if cultural practices or cultivars are to be evaluated. This study was designed to evaluate a combined energy and water balance model, ENWATBAL, to describe the concurrent heat and water fluxes in a row crop. Inputs to the model include soil and plant variables and daily weather data. Measurements were made for a period of 74 d over a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) canopy during 1985 on an Olton soil (fine, mixed, thermic Aridic Paleustolls) at Lubbock, TX. Data collected included soil-water content, soil temperature, root distribution, soil evaporation with microlysimeters, and leaf area index, for both an irrigated and a dryland plot. The values for daily evaporation and evapotranspiration calculated with the model were within 1 standard deviation of the measured values. Cumulative evaporation and evapotranspiration from the model agreed with measured values within 7% for the dryland and 8% for the irrigated plot. Estimated soil-water and temperature profiles also agreed closely to measured values. Soil evaporation was found to be 30% of evapotranspiration, for both the irrigated and the dryland plot. The ENWATBAL model provides a reliable method of evaluating the effects of management practices and crop selection on the water-use efficiency of crop production in a semiarid area.


NOTES

1 Joint contribution from the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A&M Univ., and USDA.

2 Assistant Professor, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Route 3, Box 219, Lubbock, TX 79401; Professor, Dep. of Soil & Crop Sciences, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843; Research Leader and Soil Physicist, Cropping Systems Res. Lab., USDA-ARS, Lubbock, TX 79401, respectively.

Received for publication November 10, 1986.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. J. Lascano
A General System to Measure and Calculate Daily Crop Water Use
Agron. J., September 1, 2000; 92(5): 821 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
G. Y. Qiu, J. Ben-Asher, T. Yano, and K. Momii
Estimation of Soil Evaporation Using the Differential Temperature Method
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 1999; 63(6): 1608 - 1614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Soil Science Society of America.