SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:901-905 (1987)
© 1987 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skarie, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Skarie, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, J. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Skarie, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, J. L.

Sulfate and Gypsum Determination in Saline Soils1

R. L. Skarie, J. L. Arndt and J. L. Richardson2

ABSTRACT

Despite advances in instrumentation for direct determination of SO2-4, many investigators analyzing saline soils continue to estimate SO2-4 by difference between the sums of major cations and anions and to measure gypsum by methods that avoid direct SO2-4 determination. The present study compares SO2-4 in saturation extracts as estimated by difference with SO2-4 measured by single-column ion chromatography for saline Aeric Calciaquolls and Typic Haplaquolls in eastern North Dakota. Results should be applicable throughout the Northern Great Plains. For extracts of sulfatic, saline soils, estimation of SO2-4 by difference compared favorably with SO2-4 determined directly. Results were more variable for highly chloridic soil extracts because errors from other methods were large relative to the amount of SO2-4 present. Gypsum was determined by using a sufficiently dilute extract to completely dissolve the gypsum present in the soil sample. Gypsum content was calculated in two ways, based either on Ca2+ or SO2-4 measured in the dilute extract. For highly chloridic soils, gypsum contents based on Ca2+ determination were essentially equal to the results based on SO2-4 data. For sulfatic soils, gypsum contents were lower when Ca2+ values were used due to loss of Ca2+ to the exchange complex during the extraction process.


NOTES

1 Contribution from Dep. of Soil Sci., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105. Published with the approval of the Director of the North Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn. as Journal Paper no. 1539.

2 Assistant Professor, Agric. Industries and Services, Univ. of Minnesota Tech. College, Waseca, MN 56093; Research Assistant and Professor, Dep. of Soil Sci., North Dakota State Univ., P.O. Box 5638, Fargo, ND 58105.

Received for publication November 17, 1986.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
O. Artieda, J. Herrero, and P. J. Drohan
Refinement of the Differential Water Loss Method for Gypsum Determination in Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 20, 2006; 70(6): 1932 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Soil Science Society of America.