SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:860-867 (1987)
© 1987 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dexter, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dexter, A. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dexter, A. R.

Cohesion Development in Disrupted Soils as Affected by Clay and Organic Matter Content and Temperature1

W. D. Kemper, R. C. Rosenau and A. R. Dexter2

ABSTRACT

Soils were dispersed and separated into sand, silt, and clay fractions that were reconstituted to give mixtures of each soil with 5 to 40% clay. In the range from 0 to 35% clay, higher clay contents resulted in greater stability. Rate of cohesion recovery was over 10 times as fast at 90°C as it was at 23°C, showing that the processes involved are physical-chemical rather than biological. Maximum rates of cohesion recovery occurred at moderate soil water tensions, probably because some tension is needed to pull the particles into direct contact, but a continuous water phase is also essential to allow diffusion of bonding agents to the contact points. Since diffusion rates in water increase 300%, while rate of cohesion recovery increased 1000% when temperature was raised from 23 to 90°C, other factors, such as higher solubilities at higher temperatures of compounds contributing bonding ions to the solution, probably play a role in the rate of cohesion recovery. Recovery of cohesion was more rapid in the soil with organic C contents of 0.004 kg/kg than in the soil with 0.012 kg/kg. When the organic matter was removed with H2O2 from the soil with 0.012 kg C/kg, its rate of cohesion recovery increased. Rate of cohesion recovery of this high organic matter soil was also increased by aging it at 0.1 kg H2O/kg soil compared to 0.2 kg/kg. A possible explanation is that organic coatings, tending to prevent direct contact and bonding of adjacent projections of mineral surfaces, are forced away from contact points by extremely strong forces that pull the adjacent minerals together when soil water tensions are high. When the higher organic matter soil had been consolidated by air-drying and rehydrated, its rate of cohesion recovery was just as rapid as that of the soil with low organic matter.


NOTES

1 Contribution from USDA-ARS, Snake River Conservation Research Center, Kimberly, ID 83341.

2 Soil Scientist, Agricultural Research Technician, and Consultant (at SRCRC in July to August 1985, from the Waite Inst., Univ. of Adelaide), respectively.

Received for publication May 12, 1986.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. I. Mamedov, C. Huang, and G. J. Levy
Antecedent Moisture Content and Aging Duration Effects on Seal Formation and Erosion in Smectitic Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 29, 2006; 70(3): 832 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
C. Kjaergaard, L. W. de Jonge, P. Moldrup, and P. Schjonning
Water-Dispersible Colloids: Effects of Measurement Method, Clay Content, Initial Soil Matric Potential, and Wetting Rate
Vadose Zone J., May 1, 2004; 3(2): 403 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. Imhoff, A. P. da Silva, and A. Dexter
Factors Contributing to the Tensile Strength and Friability of Oxisols
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2002; 66(5): 1656 - 1661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F. Caravaca, A. Lax, and J. Albaladejo
Soil aggregate stability and organic matter in clay and fine silt fractions in urban refuse-amended semiarid soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2001; 65(4): 1235 - 1238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. S. Bullock, F. J. Larney, R.C. Izaurralde, and Y. Feng
Overwinter Changes in Wind Erodibility of Clay Loam Soils in Southern Alberta
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2001; 65(2): 423 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A.J. Franzluebbers, S.F. Wright, and J.A. Stuedemann
Soil Aggregation and Glomalin under Pastures in the Southern Piedmont USA
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2000; 64(3): 1018 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M.R. Nemati, J. Caron, and J. Gallichand
Using Paper De-inking Sludge to Maintain Soil Structural Form: Field Measurements
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2000; 64(1): 275 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J.M. Bradford and R.W. Blanchar
Mineralogy and Water Quality Parameters in Rill Erosion of Clay-Sand Mixtures
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 1999; 63(5): 1300 - 1307.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Soil Science Society of America.