SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:491-493 (1987)
© 1987 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Doolittle, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Collins, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Doolittle, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Collins, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Doolittle, J. A.

Using Ground-Penetrating Radar to Study Soil Microvariability1

M. E. Collins and J. A. Doolittle2

ABSTRACT

A 9- by 10-m grid with observation sites 1 m apart was constructed on a mapped area of Sapelo (sandy, siliceous, thermic Ultic Haplaquods) soils to determine microvariability of depths to spodic and argillic horizons in a representative Atlantic Coast Flatwoods area. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) was compared with conventional field techniques to obtain the necessary data. Results indicated that the entire study area had a spodic horizon at an acceptable depth for the Sapelo series, but only 79% of the study area had an argillic horizon below the necessary 1-m depth. Computer-generated diagrams and maps can be used to select the most representative pedon for sampling, to display the variability of diagnostic subsurface horizons and surface elevation, and to characterize the composition of map units. Field time was reduced substantially when the GPR was used to obtain the necessary field data compared with conventional soil survey methods.


NOTES

1 Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Series no. 6714. Research supported by the Soil Genesis and Characterization Program. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.

2 Associate Professor of Soil Science, G159 McCarty Hall, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; Soil Specialist (GPR), Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Chester, PA 19013.

Received for publication April 11, 1986.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
D. J. Inman, R. S. Freeland, J. T. Ammons, and R. E. Yoder
Soil Investigations using Electromagnetic Induction and Ground-Penetrating Radar in Southwest Tennessee
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 206 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Soil Science Society of America.