SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:421-425 (1987)
© 1987 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, R. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, R. G.

Control of Furrow Erosion With Crop Residues and Surge Flow Irrigation1

D. E. Miller, J. S. Aarstad and R. G. Evans2

ABSTRACT

Crop residues in irrigation furrows reduce erosion, but also increase infiltration rates. High infiltration rates decrease uniformity of irrigation along a furrow. Surge flow improves irrigation uniformity during furrow-stream advance because the stream advances at about the same rate as with continuous flow, but requires only about one-half as much water to reach the end of a furrow. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the combined effects of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and corn (Zea mays L.) residues and surge flow irrigation on furrow erosion and irrigation uniformity. Larger than normal furrow streams (up to 30 L min–1) were used with surge flow to obtain rapid stream advance. Sediment discharge with such large streams was reduced from >100 Mg ha–1 d–1 from bare furrows to about 1 Mg ha–1 d–1 from furrows containing 2 Mg ha–1 of residue. Differences in erosion between surged and continuous furrow streams were small compared to those due to residues in the furrows. Residues grown in place were more effective in reducing erosion than were residues hand-placed in clean furrows.


NOTES

1 Contribution from USDA, Agricultural Research Service, in cooperation with the College of Agriculture and Home Economics Research Center, Washington State Univ., Pullman. Scientific Paper no. 7437 of the latter.

2 Research Soil Scientist and Agronomist, USDA-ARS, and Associate Agricultural Engineer, WSU, Prosser, WA 99350.

Received for publication June 9, 1986.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Soil Science Society of America.