HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (53) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sauer, T. J. Articles by Daniel, T. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sauer, T. J. Articles by Daniel, T. C. Agricola Articles by Sauer, T. J. Articles by Daniel, T. C.

Effect of Tillage System on Runoff Losses of Surface-applied Pesticides¹

ABSTRACT

Four tillage systems (conventional, chisel, ridge-plant, and no-till) in continuous corn (Zea mays L.) were compared with respect to surface runoff losses of atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethyl-amino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine), alachlor [2-chloro-2'6'-diethyl-N(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] and chlorpyrifos [O,O-diethyl-O-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl) phosphorothioate]. A modified Purdue sprinkling infiltrometer was used to apply simulated rainfalls of 136 and 73 mm during the 1983 and 1984 growing seasons to 1.35-m² test areas on a Griswold silt loam (Typic Argiudoll). Conservation tillage (CT) systems (chisel, ridge-plant, and no-till) reduced both runoff and soil loss; however, pesticide concentrations in runoff water and sediment for these systems were at times greater than for the conventional (moldboard plow) system. Reduced runoff volumes and erosion with CT systems offset higher pesticide concentrations resulting in few significant tillage treatment differences with respect to total pesticide loss. Maximum loss of active ingredient averaged over all tillage systems was 5.8, 4.0, and 0.2% for atrazine, alachlor, and chlorpyrifos, respectively, when high-intensity simulated rainfall was applied within 7 d of pesticide application.

¹ Research supported by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.

² Research Assistant and Professor, respectively, Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.

Received for publication February 10, 1986.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Maski, K.R. Mankin, K.A. Janssen, P. Tuppad, and G.M. Pierzynski Modeling runoff and sediment yields from combined in-field crop practices using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, July 1, 2008; 63(4): 193 - 203. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. L. Potter, C. C. Truman, T. C. Strickland, D. D. Bosch, and T. M. Webster Herbicide Incorporation by Irrigation and Tillage Impact on Runoff Loss J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2008; 37(3): 839 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Potter, C. C. Truman, T. C. Strickland, D. D. Bosch, T. M. Webster, D. H. Franklin, and C. W. Bednarz Combined Effects of Constant versus Variable Intensity Simulated Rainfall and Reduced Tillage Management on Cotton Preemergence Herbicide Runoff. J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2006; 35(5): 1894 - 1902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.D. Gaynor, C.S. Tan, C.F. Drury, H.Y.F. Ng, T.W. Welacky, and I.J. van Wesenbeeck Tillage, Intercrop, and Controlled Drainage-Subirrigation Influence Atrazine, Metribuzin, and Metolachlor Loss J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2001; 30(2): 561 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]