SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:287-290 (1987)
© 1987 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paetzold, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Matzkanin, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Paetzold, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Matzkanin, G. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Paetzold, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Matzkanin, G. A.

Pulsed Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Instrument for Soil-water Content Measurement: Sensor Configurations1

R. F. Paetzold, A. De Los Santos and G. A. Matzkanin2

ABSTRACT

Two sensor configurations of a prototype soil-water content measuring instrument were examined. The prototype instrument, based on pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance technology, is designed for field use and is capable of determining volumetric soil-water content at depths of 38, 51, and 63 mm. The magnet component of the sensor is modified by the use of pole pieces so that the sensor is capable of operating in two configurations, flat and extended. In the flat configuration, the sensor rides or floats directly on the soil surface, whereas in the extended configuration, two furrows about 10-cm deep are created in the soil to accommodate the extended pole pieces. Test results show that the instrument is more sensitive to volumetric soil-water content with the sensor in the extended configuration as opposed to the flat configuration. Furthermore, sensitivity decreases with increasing measurement depth. Sensitivity differences are explained in terms of magnetic field and radio-frequency signal characteristics.

NOTES

1 Contribution from USDA-ARS, Hydrology Lab., Agric. Systems Res. Inst., Beltsville, MD 20705.

2 Soil Scientist, USDA-SCS, Hydrology Lab., Beltsville, MD, and Senior Research Scientists, Southwest Res. Inst., San Antonio, TX. Senior author is now located at USDA-SCS, P.O. Box 2890, Washington, DC. 20013.

Received for publication December 30, 1985.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Soil Science Society of America.