HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bach, L. B. Articles by Ward, T. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bach, L. B. Articles by Ward, T. J. Agricola Articles by Bach, L. B. Articles by Ward, T. J.

Estimation of the Philip Infiltration Parameters from Rainfall Simulation Data¹

ABSTRACT

A new, simple technique for estimating the parameters of the two-term Philip infiltration equation was developed and tested using field-measured data obtained in the northern Chihuahuan desert of New Mexico. The technique simultaneously provided information on the relationship between the Philip equation parameter A, and the field-measured hydraulic conductivity. The equation was reformulated as I – cK_f = 1/2St^–1/2, where I is the infiltration rate, S the sorptivity, t the time, K_f the field-measured final infiltration rate, and c, a coefficient relating K_f to the Philip parameter A. The final, steady infiltration rate measured in the field was used for the value of K_f. Regressions of (I – cK_f) vs. (1/2t^–1/2) for values of c between 0 to 1 resulted in optimum c values for each treatment along with their corresponding S values. For the soils in this area, values for the coefficient c were sometimes outside the suggested range of 0.33 to 0.67, and were different for each study site. The regression analysis also showed that the value of S can be highly sensitive to changes in c. Using the values of S and c determined by the proposed method, a comparison was made between computed infiltration rates and measured infiltration rates. The results of this study showed that the prediction method provided adequate fits to field-measured data, and that the choice of an appropriate c factor is important in determining infiltration parameters from field data.

¹ Journal Article 1171, Agricultural Experiment Station, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM 88003. Funded in part through NSF grant no. BSR-8114466-02.

² Graduate Student and Professor, respectively, Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences; Associate Professor, Dep. of Civil Engineering, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM 88003. The senior author is presently with the USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, CO 80522.

Received for publication June 25, 1985.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. H. Schlesinger, W. H. Schlesinger, J. F. Reynolds, G. L. Cunningham, L. F. Huenneke, W. M. Jarrell, R. A. Virginia, and W. G. Whitford Biological Feedbacks in Global Desertification Science, March 2, 1990; 247(4946): 1043 - 1048. [Abstract] [PDF]