SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1272-1277 (1986)
© 1986 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Santos, M. C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Santos, M. C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Santos, M. C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. W.

Iron Redistribution in Three Boralfs (Gray Luvisols) of Saskatchewan1

M. C. D. Santos, R. J. St. Arnaud and D. W. Anderson2

ABSTRACT

The transformation and translocation of Fe in three Boralfs (Gray Luvisols)3 were studied in relation to the Fe contained within silicate minerals and that existing in oxide forms. Quantitative evaluations of the Fe redistribution using a quartz index technique provided conclusive evidence that losses of Fe from E horizons and gains in Bt horizons are largely accounted for by the translocation of silicate-Fe as a component of fine clays. The weathering of coarse clay to fine clay was documented; the fine clay fraction remained relatively unaffected. Some dissolution and movement of Fe in solution was also evident, particularly in the two profiles showing evidence of restricted drainage and periodic reduction. Detailed analyses of one of the soils studied indicated an 11% loss of total clay from the solum, involving a 16% loss of total Fe and a 19% loss of silicate-Fe from the clay fractions. Most of the Fe lost from the clay was recovered in glaebules of sand and silt size, both as reprecipitated oxides and as occluded clay particles. The actual loss of clay from the solum was only about one-half of the 11% loss indicated from particle size distribution values alone.


NOTES

1 Contribution no. R469 from the Saskatchewan Institute of Pedology, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

2 Former Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, and Adjunct Professor, Univ. of Saskatchewan. The senior author is now Professor, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.

3 Canadian soil classification name in parentheses.

Received for publication August 14, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Soil Science Society of America.