SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:661-667 (1986)
© 1986 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levine, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ciolkosz, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Levine, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ciolkosz, E. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Levine, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ciolkosz, E. J.

A Computer Simulation Model for Soil Genesis Applications1

Elissa R. Levine and Edward J. Ciolkosz2

ABSTRACT

A two horizon computer model was developed to simulate leaching and acidification processes occurring in the solid phase of soils of humid, temperate climates. The model used linear equations to describe processes of sulfate adsorption, cation exchange, mineral weathering, and precipitation and dissolution of sesquioxides within the soil. Standard soil characterization and precipitation chemistry data were used as inputs to quantitatively predict changes in soil properties over time. T-test analysis showed no significant difference at the 0.01 level between field values and those predicted by the model for base saturation, pH, and exchangeable cations. Two examples illustrated the application of the simulation model for soil genesis investigations. In the first example, acidic soils with low buffer capacities reached 60% base saturation (Ultic Hapludalfs) and 35% base saturation (Typic Hapludults) sooner than more basic soils. Using regression analysis (excluding soils with high amounts of exchangeable bases), base saturation decreased at a rate of 0.01%/yr under deciduous forest, and 0.02%/yr under coniferous forest at precipitation pH 4.1. At precipitation pH 5.5, the rate of change was much slower. In the second example, a change in soil pH over time was predicted at precipitation pH values of 4.1 and 5.5 under deciduous and coniferous forest vegetation. In all simulations, a "steady state" soil pH level was predicted, with soils under coniferous forest reaching this level sooner than those under deciduous forest. The steady state pH was lower under precipitation pH 4.1 than under pH 5.5.


NOTES

1 Authorized for publication as paper no. 7168 of the journal series of the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station, University Park, PA 16802.

2 Former Graduate Assistant and Professor of Soil Genesis and Morphology, Dep. of Agronomy, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802.

Received for publication August 29, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Soil Science Society of America.