SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:572-577 (1986)
© 1986 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fayer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hillel, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fayer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hillel, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fayer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hillel, D.

Air Encapsulation: II. Profile Water Storage and Shallow Water Table Fluctuations1

M. J. Fayer and D. Hillel2

ABSTRACT

In a wet soil, volumetric encapsulated air contents can easily approach 0.06 m3 m–3. The objective of this study was to determine, through simulation, the effect of air encapsulation on profile water storage and shallow water table fluctuations and whether air encapsulation should be considered in modeling field events. Using a two-dimensional soil moisture code that included a routine designed to model air encapsulation, we simulated profile water storage changes during hypothetical rainfall events and water table responses during actual rainfall events. The simulation results indicated that, following the infiltration of 10 mm of water, profile moisture content differences with and without air encapsulation would be <0.01 m3 m–3 and thus may not be measurable in the field with a neutron probe. Water table levels, however, rose significantly higher in the profile when air was encapsulated. Depending on the initial depth of the water table and the moisture characteristic, the water table rises were two to five times those when air was not encapsulated. For water tables located within 1.3 m of the surface, application of the model to actual rainfall events improved the fit to the measured water table data. In those situations where water table level predictions are important (e.g., wetlands, stream banks), researchers should consider air encapsulation in their analysis of water table fluctuations.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003. This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation.

2 Research Scientist, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352 and Professor, Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003.

Received for publication May 10, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Soil Science Society of America.