SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:115-120 (1986)
© 1986 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Terry, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Breakwell, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Terry, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Breakwell, D. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Terry, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Breakwell, D. P.

Effect of Irrigation Method and Acetylene Exposure on Field Denitrification Measurements1

R. E. Terry, E. N. Jellen and D. P. Breakwell2

ABSTRACT

An increased understanding of denitrification in situ may contribute to the development of agricultural practices that minimize denitrification losses from cropland. The objectives of this study were to: (i) observe the effects of sprinkle and flood irrigation on denitrification losses; and (ii) to evaluate the effects of acetylene (C2H2) exposure on inhibition of nitrification and C2H2 decomposition. Acetylene was introduced into the soil atmosphere of field plots either by flood irrigation with C2H2-treated water or by continuous diffusion of C2H2 from dispersion tubes placed in the soil to a depth of 25 cm. Some plots received C2H2 through dispersion tubes continuously for 42 d, while rotated plots received the gas for 7 d and were then abandoned in favor of fresh plots. Denitrification losses from the fallow, clay loam soil were approximately 16-kg N when the soil was flood-irrigated and approximately 3-kg N when the soil was sprinkle-irrigated. Soil environmental conditions within the disintegrated structure of the flood-irrigated soil promoted denitrification losses. Nitrification rates in C2H2-treated soils were only 30 and 87% of control rates, but nitrification rates recovered within 4 d after removal of the gas. The complications of nitrification inhibition by acetylene in field denitrification studies may be minimized by intermittent exposure of soil to acetylene or by rotation of experimental sites. Soil microorganisms began to metabolize C2H2 after 7 d of continuous exposure. The problems of C2H2 decomposition and decreased C2H2 partial pressures were overcome by rotating field plots every 7 d.


NOTES

1 This publication is based upon work supported by Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT 84602.

2 Associate Professor of Soil Microbiology and Student Assistants, Dep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT 84602.

Received for publication April 5, 1985. Accepted for publication September 10, 1985.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Soil Science Society of America.