SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1290-1297 (1985)
© 1985 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Martens, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harris, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Martens, D. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Harris, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Martens, D. C.

Biotite Kaolinization in Virginia Piedmont Soils: I. Extent, Profile Trends, and Grain Morphological Effects1

W. G. Harris, L. W. Zelazny, J. C. Baker and D. C. Martens2

ABSTRACT

Biotite kaolinization was examined for acidic, well-drained Virginia Piedmont soils with respect to extent, profile trends, and grain morphological effects. Fifty-eight samples from 16 profiles were treated to remove Fe-oxides, fractionated by particle size, and examined mineralogically using optical microscopy and x-ray diffraction (XRD). Selected samples were examined by infrared (IR) spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetric (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Hg-intrusion porosimetry. All profiles contained kaolinized biotite sand grains and had kaolinite-dominated clay fractions. Vermiculite was a minor component of most samples. Kaolinization increased with decreasing particle size and, for some profiles, with decreasing depth. Individual sand-sized grains commonly contained both biotite and kaolinite. Kaolinized grains had lighter colored, duller (001) cleavage surfaces, and more pores than unaltered biotite grains. Pores extended from the edges inward, exposing new surfaces to soil solution thereby fostering continued kaolinite encroachment. The pore volume difference between kaolinite and biotite specimens was only slightly greater than the calculated difference based on a 1:1 layer-for-layer replacement of biotite by kaolinite.


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Dep. of Agronomy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061.

2 Former Research Associate, Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor, respectively. Senior author is now Assistant Professor of Soil Mineralogy/Genesis in the Soil Science Dep. at the Univ. of Florida, Gainesville.

Received for publication July 9, 1984. Accepted for publication March 27, 1985.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. Jolicoeur, P. Ildefonse, and M. Bouchard
Kaolinite and Gibbsite Weathering of Biotite within Saprolites and Soils of Central Virginia
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2000; 64(3): 1118 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Soil Science Society of America.