SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1105-1109 (1985)
© 1985 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaviv, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mattigod, S. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shaviv, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mattigod, S. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shaviv, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mattigod, S. V.

Potassium Fixation Characteristics of Five Southern California Soils1

A. Shaviv, M. Mohsin, P. F. Pratt and S. V. Mattigod2

ABSTRACT

Potassium fixation in five southern California soils, sampled at 15-cm depth increments down to a depth of 105 cm, is reported. The objective was to develop quantitative relationships between K fixation and other soil and solution properties. The experiments were conducted under wet conditions only and the exchangeable cation removal done by BaCl2. Potassium fixation, Kf, was calculated by the difference between total initial K and total final exchangeable plus soluble K in a given system and compared to {Delta}CEC, the decreases in the initial cation exchange capacity (CECin). The difference between Kf and {Delta}CEC appeared small, inferring that under wet field conditions, fixation mainly occurred via the mechanism of K entrapment between clay plates. Linear increases of Kf with EP (the ratio of adsorbed K to adsorbed Ca and Mg) and with PAR = {(K+)/[(Ca2+)+(Mg2+)]1/2} were found for each depth for each soil. Potassium fixation also increased with increasing depth. Relating the fractional fixation FKf = (Kf/CECin) to EP and PAR, a more general representation of K fixation was obtained. Fractional fixation and EP showed a linear relationship as FKf = A2 + B2 x EP. Such a correlation resulted in one or two regression lines representative of fixation through a given soil profile to the 105-cm depth.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA. Financial support from BARD is gratefully acknowledged.

2 Postgraduate Research Soil Scientist, Visiting Soil Scientist, Professor, and Assistant Professor of Soil Science, respectively. M. Mohsin is an Associate Professor, Universidad del Oriente, Cumana, Venezuela. The address for the senior author is now TECHNION, Dep. Soil Science, Haifa 32000, Israel.

Received for publication July 23, 1984. Accepted for publication March 26, 1985.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Soil Science Society of America.