SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:911-914 (1985)
© 1985 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alvarado, A.
Right arrow Articles by Buol, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Alvarado, A.
Right arrow Articles by Buol, S. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Alvarado, A.
Right arrow Articles by Buol, S. W.

Field Estimation of Phosphate Retention by Andepts1

Alfredo Alvarado and S. W. Buol2

ABSTRACT

In an attempt to develop a field method for soil surveyors and field agronomists to rapidly evaluate whether or not a particular site would retain a large amount of applied phosphate, 59 samples of Andepts from Costa Rica and Guatemala were incubated with rates of P, then analyzed. Phosphate retention ranged from 25 to 99% and correlated quite well with ammonium oxalate extractable Al concentration (R2 = 0.56) in a linear model. In samples with <2.4% ammonium oxalate extractable Al, the amount of applied phosphate retained was related even better to this measurement, while at > 2.4% oxalate extractable Al, retention was not influenced appreciably by oxalate extractable Al concentration. Phosphate retention was also correlated with pH in NaF. By the methods used, >90% phosphate retention was predicted by an oxalate extractable Al concentration of >2.4% or a NaF pH of >10.7. A quick test was devised to assess soils with extremely high phosphate retention. The method consisted of adding a few drops of 0.1 mol NaF L–1 to approximately one gram of soil in a spot plate and, after 10 min, checking the pH with two drops of 0.04% thymolphythalein indicator. This technique was found to correctly identify 79% of the samples as having either gl90% phosphate retention.


NOTES

1 Paper no. 9440 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Research Service, Raleigh, NC 27695-7619.

2 Professor, Univ. of Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica, and Professor, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, respectively.

Received for publication August 6, 1984. Accepted for publication February 21, 1985.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Soil Science Society of America.