SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:734-738 (1985)
© 1985 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evett, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dutt, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Evett, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dutt, G. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Evett, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dutt, G. R.

Length and Slope Effects on Runoff from Sodium Dispersed, Compacted Earth Microcatchments1

Steven R. Evett and Gordon R. Dutt2

ABSTRACT

The effects of microcatchment slope and length on runoff and erosion rates were studied under 18 rain storms to get information for design of water harvesting systems. Two replicates of a two-factor experiment, including 1, 5, 10, and 15% slopes and 3-and 6-m lengths, were built on a gravelly sandy clay loam (mixed mineralogy) using 11.2 t ha–1 of NaCl mixed into the surface 2 to 5 cm of soil followed by compaction with a 6-t roller after a heavy rain. Both slope and length had effects on runoff significant at the 0.1% probability level but the effect of rainfall intensity was not significant. The best fit linear model of runoff, Q, (cm) vs. rainfall, P, (cm) was Q = 0.858(P – 0.34) which explained about 98% of the variability in runoff on individual plots for individual storms but which explained no differences in runoff among treatments. A nonlinear model incorporating slope, s, (m/m) and length, x, (m) accounted for about 96% of the variability in average total runoff among treatments. This model, Q = (s0.0453 x–0.183 + 0.183)(P – 0.339), shows that the important differences in runoff among treatments can be explained by slope and length alone for our conditions. Water quality analyses indicated that only a minor salinity problem but slight to moderate permeability problems might be expected. However, no apparent problems have arisen in 12 yr of grape (Vitis vinifera) and fruit tree (Prunis sp.) cultivation in a water harvesting system using our catchment on the same soil.


NOTES

1 Arizona Agric. Exp. Stn. Paper no. 3940. Support was from the USDA Grant no. 82-CRSR-2-2005 under Public Law 89-106 as amended.

2 Graduate Research Associate and Professor, respectively, Dep. of Soils, Water & Engineering, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Received for publication August 20, 1984. Accepted for publication November 16, 1984.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Soil Science Society of America.