SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:708-712 (1985)
© 1985 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norton, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Norton, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Norton, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, J. M.

Thermoluminescence Dating of Loess from Western Iowa1

L. Darrell Norton and Joe M. Bradford2

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to evaluate thermoluminescence as an alternative to radiocarbon dating to determine age of soil materials low in organic carbon from major loess units from western Iowa. Thermoluminescence (TL) ages were determined for Upper Wisconsinan (Peoria), Basal Wisconsinan ("Farmdale") and Loveland loesses using the fine-grained technique on the 4 to 11 µm particle size fraction. Corrections were made for soil moisture and cosmic radiation influences. Thermoluminescence dating was effective in separating the three major loess units studied. The dates for Upper Wisconsinan (Peoria) loess were comparable to published radiocarbon dates, ranging between 13 150 to 24 130; however, there was considerable variability in the dates. The Basal Wisconsinan ("Farmdale") loess gave considerably older ages (45 960–46 720) than reported with radiocarbon dating. Illinoian age Loveland loess yielded a date of 89 200 yr and was somewhat younger than presumed for the Illinoian advance. Thermoluminescence dating appears to be a viable alternative to radiocarbon dating of loess when organic material is not present, but more work is needed to rectify the age discrepancies. Although TL dating does not give dates in stratigraphic or chronological agreement with radiocarbon dating, it does differentiate the loesses studied.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the National Soil Erosion Laboratory, USDA-ARS. In cooperation with Purdue Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Presented in part before Div. S-5 Soil Science Society of America, August 15, 1983 in Washington, DC. Purdue Jour. no. 9974.

2 Soil Scientists, USDA-ARS, National Soil Erosion Laboratory and Assistant and Associate Professors, Purdue Univ. Dep. of Agronomy, West Lafayette, IN.

Received for publication July 23, 1984. Accepted for publication January 22, 1985.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Soil Science Society of America.