SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:285-288 (1985)
© 1985 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parlange, J.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Vachaud, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Parlange, J.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Vachaud, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Parlange, J.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Vachaud, G.

Flux and Water Content Relation at the Soil Surface1

J.-Y. Parlange, W. L. Hogarth, J. F. Boulier, J. Touma, R. Haverkamp and G. Vachaud2

ABSTRACT

A general analytical equation is presented which relates the surface water content and surface flux. The result is obtained for general soil properties and arbitrary dependence of the flux on time. The equation is approximate but optimal at least in the short time limit. Its accuracy is assessed by comparison with numerical and experimental results for Grenoble sand and when the surface flux is constant. The analytical and numerical results differ by a small amount which would however be significant if the analytical result was used to predict the time at which a certain water content is reached at the surface, for instance the value of time at ponding. It is shown that the numerical solution has an intrinsic error in the short time limit. This suggests that the analytical result may be more accurate than the numerical solution. This is reinforced by the good agreement between the numerical results and an earlier approximate analytical solution which is known to be often inaccurate, for instance if it is used to estimate the value of the sorptivity. Finally, careful experimental observation shows closer agreement with the analytical result than with the numerical solution.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the School of Australian Environmental Studies, Griffith Univ., Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia; and Institut de Mecanique, B.P. 68, 38402 Saint Martin D'Heres, Cédex, Grenoble, France.

2 Professor and Lecturer, The School of Australian Environmental Studies, Griffith Univ.; and Postgraduate Student, Assistant Teacher, Research Scientist and Research Scientist, Institut de Mécanique, Grenoble, respectively.

Received for publication November 2, 1983. Accepted for publication August 14, 1984.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Soil Science Society of America.