SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1276-1280 (1984)
© 1984 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Munns, D. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Munns, D. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Munns, D. N.

Effects of Rhizobial Extracellular Polysaccharide on pH and Aluminum Activity1

Scott D. Cunningham and Donald N. Munns2

ABSTRACT

A positive correlation has been demonstrated between the ability of Rhizobium strains to colonize acidic agar surfaces and their production of extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) in solution culture at pH 7.0. This set of experiments examined the effects of EPS on solution pH levels and Al activity, two common growth-limiting factors in acid soils. Samples of EPS from each of 20 previously acid-screened Rhizobium phaseoli isolates were titrated under controlled conditions and a buffering capacity was calculated. In addition, EPS from all strains were compared for ability to chelate aluminum by sodium saturation followed by equilibration against an aluminum-phosphate solid phase. Total aluminum of the digested samples was measured by atomic adsorption spectrophotometry. The buffering ability of the EPS varied considerably between strains but was not correlated with the acid tolerance of the strain from which each was isolated. Similarly, while there were significant differences in the ability of the EPS to chelate aluminum, these were not correlated with acid tolerance. Acid tolerance did not correlate with EPS production weighted for either buffering capacity of the EPS or its ability to chelate Al. Thus, while the amount of ethanol-precipitatable EPS from different rhizobial strains varied significantly in these two capacities, rhizobial EPS does not appear to confer acid tolerance on a strain by means of buffering pH or aluminum levels. Other possible causes of the observed relationship between acid tolerance and EPS production should be examined. These could include a role in increasing solution phosphate levels and/or the necessity of increased EPS for binding to plant lectins in an acidic environment.


NOTES

1 Partially supported by a grant from the U.S. Agency for International Development and subcontract from Univ. of Hawaii/NifTAL project.

2 Former graduate student and professor, respectively; Dep. of Land, Air and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis.

Received for publication April 18, 1984. Accepted for publication July 6, 1984.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1984 by the Soil Science Society of America.