SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1262-1266 (1984)
© 1984 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilmour, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gilmour, J. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gilmour, J. T.

The Effects of Soil Properties on Nitrification and Nitrification Inhibition1

J. T. Gilmour2

ABSTRACT

An understanding of the impact of the soil environment on nitrification in the presence and absence of a nitrification inhibitor is important to proper use of this group of compounds. The objective of this study was to describe the kinetics of the nitrification process and define how a nitrification inhibitor, etradiazole (5-ethoxy-3-trichloromethyl-1,2,4-thiadiazole), altered the reaction. Nitrification was found to obey zero-order kinetics with the rate constant being a function of temperature, moisture, and pH. The absolute zero-order rate was also a function of initial ammonium concentration. As temperature increased over the range of 16 to 28°C, the rate constant increased according to the Arrhenius equation. The relative influence of the inhibitor on the rate constant decreased with temperature increases. Below the optimum soil moisture for nitrification a linear decline in rate was observed as soil moisture decreased over the range of 0.20 to 0.12 g g–1 (–40 to – 140 kPa). This decline was greater in the control than in the soil amended with etradiazole. Nitrification linearly increased with soil pH over the range of 4.9 to 7.2. Using the above relationships, the rate of nitrification was predictable for an independent group of 19 soils. This same group of soils was evaluated for inhibition at two etradiazole rates at optimum moisture and 14°C. Inhibition decreased as organic carbon content increased above 13 g kg–1 with the extent of the decrease being modified by the amount of clay in the soil. As inhibitor rate increased, inhibition was enhanced by a constant amount, suggesting that the relationships described above remained in effect.


NOTES

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the Univ. of Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 Professor of agronomy, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701.

Received for publication March 2, 1984. Accepted for publication June 13, 1984.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1984 by the Soil Science Society of America.