SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:92-95 (1984)
© 1984 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prabhakaran Nair, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mengel, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prabhakaran Nair, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mengel, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Prabhakaran Nair, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mengel, K.

Importance of Phosphate Buffer Power for Phosphate Uptake by Rye1

K. P. Prabhakaran Nair and K. Mengel2

ABSTRACT

As soil test data for available P are often unsatisfactory, it was investigated whether the integration of the P buffer power of soils would improve the information from soil tests. The P buffer power of eight soils differing widely in their characteristics was assessed by plotting the calcium-lactate exchangeable P (P quantity) vs. the electro-ultrafiltration extractable P (P intensity). After dressing these soils with increasing amounts of soluble phosphate, they were analyzed for available P after an incubation period of 1 week by extracting P using electro-ultrafiltration (EUF-P) and calcium-lactate (CAL-P). The P concentration in the tops and the P uptake of young rye (Secale cereale L.) plants grown on these soils in pots supplied with five increasing P rates were correlated with the EUF-P and CAL-P soil test data. Significant and highly significant correlations between soil test and the P uptake and soil test and P concentration in rye seedlings, respectively, were obtained. These correlations were further much improved when the P buffer power of soils was integrated into the computation in the form of a multiple regression analysis. The R2 thus obtained was about 0.8, showing that about 80% of the variance in P uptake and P concentration in plant tops can be related to the variance in the P soil test data (CAL or EUF technique) and to the variance of the P buffer power of soils. It is concluded that soil tests for available soil P can be substantially improved by taking into consideration the P buffer power of soils.


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Justus Liebig-University Giessen, Inst. of Plant Nutrition, Südanlage 6, 6300 Giessen, West Germany.

2 Alexander von Humboldt Fellow and Professor and Director, respectively. The senior author is now Professor, Inst. of Agric. Science, The University Centre, Dschang, The United Republic of Cameroon. Reprint requests may be sent to Dr. Mengel.

Received for publication March 3, 1983. Accepted for publication August 31, 1983.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1984 by the Soil Science Society of America.