HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stitt, R. E. Articles by Nelson, L. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stitt, R. E. Articles by Nelson, L. A. Agricola Articles by Stitt, R. E. Articles by Nelson, L. A.

Mechanical Impedance of Tillage Pans in Atlantic Coastal Plains Soils and Relationships with Soil Physical, Chemical, and Mineralogical Properties¹

ABSTRACT

Mechanical impedance (MI) is an important property of root-restricting, tillage-induced pans common to Ultisols in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina. The relationship between MI and other soil properties is not well understood. The purposes of this study were to quantify selected physical, chemical, and mineralogical properties of tillage pans and to correlate MI to these measurements.

Mechanical impedance of tillage-induced pans at 50 sites in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina was measured with a constant rate cone penetrometer on triplicate, undisturbed soil cores. Sites were selected to give a broad range of measured MI values. Impedance at a soil water pressure (SWP) of -0.10 bar ranged from 3.8 to 39.4 kg/cm²; for -1.00 bar, 19 to 98 kg/cm². Other measured soil properties included particle size, the particle-size coefficient of uniformity (CU), bulk density (D_b), saturated hydraulic conductivity, dense soil angle of repose (DSAR), soil water characteristic, cation exchange capacity (CEC), external and total surface area, free iron oxides, and the amounts of organic matter, Ca, Mg, P, K, Mn, gibbsite, kaolinite, and amorphous silica and alumina.

A stepwise regression procedure (maximum R-square improvement technique) was used to select the best models relating MI to the measured soil properties. For this grouping of soils, no one physical, chemical, or mineralogical parameter correlated well with MI. The best single variable model was found for P_w as the independent variable but this relationship had an R² value of only 0.15. The best three-variable model included P_w, DSAR, and D_b and had an R² = 0.67. When MI data was subjected to a log₁₀ transformation, the R² for the three-variable model increased to 0.74.

Key Words: Ultisol • penetrometer • dense soil angle of repose • external surface area • internal surface area

¹ Contribution from the Dep. of Soil Science and Dep. of Statistics, North Carolina State Univ. Paper no. 6,893 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, NC 27650.

² Former Research Assistant and Professors of Soil Science and Statistics. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27650.

Received for publication May 13, 1981. Accepted for publication September 28, 1981.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. P. Vaz and J. W. Hopmans Simultaneous Measurement of Soil Penetration Resistance and Water Content with a Combined Penetrometer-TDR Moisture Probe Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2001; 65(1): 4 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text]