SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:970-974 (1981)
© 1981 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garbouchev, I. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Garbouchev, I. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Garbouchev, I. P.

The Manufacture and Agronomic Efficiency of a Partially Acidulated Phosphate Rock Fertilizer1

I. P. Garbouchev2

ABSTRACT

North Africa phosphate rock, Gafsa type (PR), and different PR/H3PO4 ratios were investigated to find an efficient, partially acidulated PR fertilizer (PAPR). A monocalcium phosphate (MCP)/PR ratio of approximately 60/40, produced by 26 to 30% acidulation of PR by H3PO4, was the most efficient PAPR product; it requires 68 to 70% less H3PO4 than the amount required for manufacture of triple superphosphate (TSP).

PAPR products made in pilot plants by the "Door-Oliver" process were more efficient than those produced by the "Batch" process. Field experiments with PAPR fertilizer were carried out from 1970 to 1978. Agronomic results showed that the above product was generally equal or slightly superior to TSP in terms of P availability as detected by routine soil test methods. Models on control of the P status in several soils were established on the basis of greenhouse experiments with increasing P rates for ryegrass (Lolium perenne L).

Commercial factory production of PAPR by the "Door Oliver" process costs 30 to 35% less than that of TSP because of lower total energy and less H3PO4 used. An additional advantage appears to be a 50 to 65% increase in fertilizer output in factory-scale installation. In practice, higher available soil P was maintained, and at least equal crop yields were obtained with a higher rate, less frequently applied, than with the same total P rate applied more often in fractional applications. This was especially true for PAPR.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition, N. Poushkarov Inst. of Soil Sci., Sofia, Bulgaria.

2 Present address: United Nations Environment Programme, P.O. Box 47074, Nairobi, Kenya.

Received for publication April 15, 1980. Accepted for publication May 5, 1981.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the Soil Science Society of America.