SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:936-940 (1981)
© 1981 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Blake, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Blake, G. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Blake, G. R.

Laboratory Evaluation of Soil Mixtures for Sports Turf1

D. H. Taylor and G. R. Blake2

ABSTRACT

The suitability of soil mixtures for sports turfgrass areas is often determined by measuring physical properties of laboratory-packed samples. The objectives of this study were (i) to establish a basis for choice of laboratory packing conditions for preparing test samples; and (ii) to determine whether physical properties of soil mixtures after in-situ settling on sports turfgrass areas were correlated to physical properties of the same mixtures packed and tested in the laboratory.

Seven soil mixtures varying from 76 to 97% sand by weight were packed in the laboratory by applying impact energies of 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0 J/cm2 to samples at water potentials of –30, –100, –330 mbar. Comparisons of Ksat and bulk density of laboratory-packed samples with sustained infiltration rate and bulk density of mixtures after turf growth and compaction under greenhouse conditions indicated a packing combination of 3.0 J/cm2 packing energy to a sample at –100 mbar water potential was equal or preferable to any other combination.

Using this laboratory packing combination, Ksat, bulk density, and air porosity at –30, –40, –60, and –100 mbar water potentials of undisturbed cores from golf greens were compared to corresponding properties on disturbed samples taken from the greens and packed in the laboratory. Laboratory-packed samples were not indicative of the properties of soil mixtures after settling in situ on greens. Sand content was a better measure of the physical qualities of soil mixtures in the field than were physical properties of laboratory-packed samples.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn., Univ. of Minn. Scientific Journal Series Paper no. 11,423.

2 Former Research Assistant and Professor of Soil Science, Univ. of Minn., St. Paul, MN 55108. Senior Author is presently Assistant Professor, Dep. of Horticultural Science and Landscape Architecture, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.

Received for publication October 10, 1980. Accepted for publication June 15, 1981.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
D. D. Fritton
Fitting Uniaxial Soil Compression Using Initial Bulk Density, Water Content, and Matric Potential
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 21, 2006; 70(4): 1262 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
F. C. Waltz Jr., V. L. Quisenberry, and L. B. McCarty
Physical and Hydraulic Properties of Rootzone Mixes Amended with Inorganics for Golf Putting Greens
Agron. J., March 1, 2003; 95(2): 395 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1981 by the Soil Science Society of America.