HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bauder, J. W. Articles by Swann, J. B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bauder, J. W. Articles by Swann, J. B. Agricola Articles by Bauder, J. W. Articles by Swann, J. B.

Effect of Four Continuous Tillage Systems on Mechanical Impedance of a Clay Loam Soil¹

ABSTRACT

Soil strength may influence root growth as much as soil bulk density and matric potential. Aerial plant growth and harvestable crop yield have been positively correlated with root growth under some circumstances. Farm machine traffic and tillage practices affect soil strength and mechanical impedance. Most field studies of soil strength, mechanical impedance, root growth, and tillage have been performed on relatively coarsetextured, loamy sand soils. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of four continuous tillage systems on strength, mechanical impedance, and soil physical properties of a Nicollet clay loam soil, a fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Aquic Hapludoll.

Following 10 years of continuous tillage in a monoculture grain-corn (Zea mays L.) production system, soil bulk density (), porosity (), water content (), and mechanical resistance (cone index, CI) were measured on four tillage systems. Replicated measurements of , , , and CI were made as a function of both depth and position relative to the crop row. No attempt was made to distinguish trafficked and nontrafficked interrow areas because of lack of complete traffic control. Tillage systems included (i) fall moldboard plow, (ii) fall chisel plow, (iii) spring disk, and (iv) no tillage-slot plant.

Tillage treatment, soil depth, and depth by position interaction were sources of significant variation in CI. Differences in CI due to position relative to crop row were not significant. Significant differences in , , and were attributed to depth and depth x tillage interaction.

Tillage and traffic pans were observed under all tillage systems except chisel plowing. Annual moldboard plowing and chisel plowing in the fall resulted in the least amounts of mechanical resistance. Maximum CI resulted from spring disking practices. Mechanical impedance following continuous no tillage was similar in distributional pattern to the spring disking system, although CI following no tillage was not as great. Continuous no tillage and spring disking resulted in pronounced increases in CI close to the soil surface (0–7.5 cm). These increases in CI were attributed to tillage, traffic pans, or to both. These zones of increased mechanical resistance may potentially be root-restricting layers.

Increased emphasis on reduced and no tillage systems of seedbed preparation and monoculture production systems may lead to an increase in root-restricting tillage pans in clay loam soils. If increased root growth is necessary to insure an adequate supply of water and nutrients, then periodic, relatively deep chisel or moldboard plowing may be necessary to eliminate or modify shallow tillage- and traffic-induced pans that could potentially restrict root growth.

¹ Contribution from the Dep. of Soil Sci., Univ. of Minnesota and Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn., St. Paul, MN 55108. Released as Journal Article no. 11,242.

² Formerly Associate Professor of Soil Science, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108; Soil Scientist, Southern Exp. Stn., Waseca, MN 56093; and Professor of Soil Science, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108. Senior author is currently Associate Professor/Extension Soil Scientist at Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717.

Received for publication November 11, 1980. Accepted for publication March 23, 1981.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Kumudini, L. Grabau, D. Van Sanford, and J. Omielan Analysis of Yield-Formation Processes under No-Till and Conventional Tillage for Soft Red Winter Wheat in the South-Central Region Agron. J., June 16, 2008; 100(4): 1026 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Vetsch, G. W. Randall, and J. A. Lamb Corn and Soybean Production as Affected by Tillage Systems Agron. J., June 5, 2007; 99(4): 952 - 959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. W. Wilhelm, J. M. F. Johnson, J. L. Hatfield, W. B. Voorhees, and D. R. Linden Crop and Soil Productivity Response to Corn Residue Removal: A Literature Review Agron. J., January 1, 2004; 96(1): 1 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Beyaert, J. W. Schott, and P. H. White Tillage Effects on Corn Production in a Coarse-Textured Soil in Southern Ontario Agron. J., July 1, 2002; 94(4): 767 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. M. Sainju, B. P. Singh, and S. Yaffa Soil Organic Matter and Tomato Yield following Tillage, Cover Cropping, and Nitrogen Fertilization Agron. J., May 1, 2002; 94(3): 594 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Gebhardt, M. R. Gebhardt, T. C. Daniel, E. E. Schweizer, and R. R. Allmaras Conservation Tillage Science, November 8, 1985; 230(4726): 625 - 630. [Abstract] [PDF]