SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:794-799 (1981)
© 1981 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McSweeney, K.
Right arrow Articles by Dancer, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McSweeney, K.
Right arrow Articles by Dancer, W. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McSweeney, K.
Right arrow Articles by Dancer, W. S.

Subsurface Horizon Blending: An Alternative Strategy to B Horizon Replacement for the Construction of Post-Mine Soils1

K. McSweeney, I. J. Jansen and W. S. Dancer2

ABSTRACT

This study was initiated to evaluate various combinations of substratum and B horizon materials, as subsurface rooting media. Materials were collected from each solum and substratum horizon to a depth of about 6 m at two surface mine sites. One of the sites was in southern Illinois and had an infertile Darmstadt (Albic Natraqualf) surface soil with a strongly acid (pH 5.2) and natric subsoil. The other was in west central Illinois and had a Sable (Typic Haplaquoll) surface soil which supports high yielding grain crops with proper management.

The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse using large plant containers. The test crop, soybean, was germinated in A horizon material, or in a blend of materials containing A horizon, placed over the given surface rooting medium. This procedure was employed in order to simulate field conditions where seeds germinate in topsoil and root into the underlying material. Performance of the test crop was best where A horizon was segregated and replaced over a blend of the next 3 m of material for treatments made from the Darmstadt materials from southern Illinois. It was poorest where A horizon material was replaced over material from the Darmstadt B2 horizon. The other treatments were intermediate in performance between the A/Top 3 m and the A/B2 (subsoil). A similar trend was found with the Sable materials from west central Illinois, but the difference between the best performing treatment, A/Top 3 m, and the poorest, A/B2 (subsoil), was not as marked.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Illinois, U-C Campus, Urbana. Part of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the M.S. degree at the Univ. of Illinois.

2 Graduate Assistant, Associate Professor, and Research Associate, Univ. of Illinois, respectively.

Received for publication March 18, 1981. Accepted for publication March 30, 1981.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1981 by the Soil Science Society of America.