SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:692-698 (1981)
© 1981 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luxmoore, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Luxmoore, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, M. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Luxmoore, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, M. R.

Hydraulic Properties of Fullerton Cherty Silt Loam1

R. J. Luxmoore, T. Grizzard and M. R. Patterson2

ABSTRACT

Soil hydraulic properties at eight depths in a Fullerton cherty silt loam (a clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Paleudult) profile were derived from measurements of water content with a calibrated neutron probe and of matric potential with tensiometers during drainage of a flooded 2- by 2- by 3-m deep soil plot. Soil cores taken from the field plot were used for laboratory determinations of the retention properties. The field retention data were generally unsatisfactory, indicating significant differences in the response times and spatial resolution of the tensiometers and neutron probe. The tensiometers did not provide reliable hydraulic gradient data during drainage. Hydraulic conductivity was calculated by the instantaneous profile method and by three simple field methods, assuming a unit hydraulic gradient in all methods. There were greater differences in hydraulic characteristics between two profiles 1 m apart than there were between the alternative methods of calculation. Maximum hydraulic conductivity calculated by the instantaneous profile method for the well-aggregated B horizons had values up to 58 and 177 cm per day at two positions in the soil plot.


NOTES

1 Research sponsored by the Office of Health and Environmental Res., U.S. DOE, under contract W-7405-eng-26 with Union Carbide Corp. Publication no. 1747, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Lab., Oak Ridge, Tenn.

2 Research Staff Member and Research Associate, Oak Ridge National Lab.; and Senior Computer Applications Specialist, Computer Sciences Division, Union Carbide Corp., Nuclear Division, respectively.

Received for publication December 11, 1980. Accepted for publication April 2, 1981.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. Mecke, C.J. Westman, and H. Ilvesniemi
Prediction of Near-Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Three Podzolic Boreal Forest Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2000; 64(2): 485 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1981 by the Soil Science Society of America.