HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Howard, R. F. Articles by Frantz, G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Howard, R. F. Articles by Frantz, G. A. Agricola Articles by Howard, R. F. Articles by Frantz, G. A.

Effects of Soil Properties, Water Content, and Compactive Effort on the Compaction of Selected California Forest and Range Soils¹

ABSTRACT

Soil compaction reduces plant growth in a variety of settings. In forest and range sites, amelioration of a compacted soil is usually impractical, therefore, emphasis has been given to minimizing and preventing compaction. To provide information on inherent soil compactibility, important factors related to susceptibility to compaction were identified by multiple linear regression of soil physical and chemical properties on Proctor maximum dry bulk densities. The following equation was derived:

D_b = 1.91 – 0.0596 C – 0.0076 W_l + 0.0019 S + 0.0058 Fe, where D_b = maximum dry bulk density in g/cm³, C = organic C content, W_l = water content at liquid limit, S = total sand, and Fe = dithionite Fe. The equation has an adjusted R² of 98.6% and S_y,x = 0.0356.

With the use of organic C content, Proctor densities, and normalized change in porosity after compaction as criteria, the 14 soils were ranked by relative susceptibility to compaction. The three criteria produced virtually the same groupings of soils, with the four range soils in the study being most compactible.

Moisture content and compactive effort, which can be controlled, are important factors influencing soil compaction. To further understand the compaction behavior of these forest and range soils, six representative soils of different textural characteristics were subjected to Proctor compaction, with 30, 50, and 100 blows at three to four moisture contents ranging from field capacity to 15% less than field capacity. Density increased significantly with each increase in compactive effort, and maximum values were reached near the optimum moisture content of the standard compaction treatment.

Analysis of moisture characteristic curves for 14 forest and range soils suggests that two range soils would occur in the field at water contents making them susceptible to puddling. About half the soils would remain at near optimum water contents for compaction for a long period of time under field conditions.

¹ Contribution from the Dep. of Land, Air, & Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. Work supported by a grant from USDA, U.S. Forest Service, Region V.

² Research Assistant, Associate Professor of Soil Science, and Research Assistant, respectively. Senior author is now Soil Scientist, USDA-SCS, Hillsboro, OR 97123.

Received for publication May 23, 1980. Accepted for publication October 27, 1980.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Zhao, M. Krzic, C. E. Bulmer, and M. G. Schmidt Maximum Bulk Density of British Columbia Forest Soils from the Proctor Test: Relationships with Selected Physical and Chemical Properties Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 25, 2008; 72(2): 442 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Siegel-Issem, J. A. Burger, R. F. Powers, F. Ponder, and S. C. Patterson Seedling Root Growth as a Function of Soil Density and Water Content Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2005; 69(1): 215 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gomez, R. F. Powers, M. J. Singer, and W. R. Horwath Soil Compaction Effects on Growth of Young Ponderosa Pine Following Litter Removal in California's Sierra Nevada Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2002; 66(4): 1334 - 1343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.H. McNabb, A.D. Startsev, and H. Nguyen Soil Wetness and Traffic Level Effects on Bulk Density and Air-Filled Porosity of Compacted Boreal Forest Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2001; 65(4): 1238 - 1247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]