SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:988-992 (1980)
© 1980 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahler, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wollum, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mahler, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wollum, A. G., II
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mahler, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wollum, A. G.

Influence of Water Potential on the Survival of Rhizobia in a Goldsboro Loamy Sand1

R. L. Mahler and A. G. Wollum, II2

ABSTRACT

Inoculation of soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] at planting in North Carolina is apparently ineffective due to unfavorable environmental conditions. Water potential has been suspected to be a primary factor in inoculation failure; however, the lack of a suitable method to artifically control or create desired water potentials in laboratory environments has prevented investigation.

The objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate a technique designed to maintain soil water potentials for incubation studies, and (ii) to investigate the influence of water potential on the survival of 10 Rhizobium japonicum strains in a Goldsboro loamy sand (Aquic Paleudult). Dow Ziploc Storage Bags were employed to maintain desired water potentials while the most probable number (MPN) technique and plant infectivity tests were used to enumerate rhizobia.

Water potential was found to have a profound effect on numbers of rhizobia in a Goldsboro loamy sand. Rhizobial numbers were from one to three log numbers lower under water potentials of –15 bars than at potentials near field capacity. There was usually a depression of one log number at –5 bars. In most cases the 9-week rhizobial numbers were less at water potentials of –0.10 bar than at potentials of –0.50 and –0.33 bars. Total aerobic bacteria and aerobic sporeformer numbers also declined at both high and low water potentials. Differences in ability to tolerate low water potentials were noted between the 10 serogroups tested. In general, isolates from serogroups 110, 122, and 138 survived in much greater numbers at water potentials of –15 bars than the other seven serogroup isolates. Isolates of serogroups 24, 31, 94, and 123 were particularly vulnerable to water stress as populations at 9 weeks were more than four log numbers less than the initial populations. Field soil water potential data confirmed that –15 and –5 bar values which reduce rhizobial numbers are found to be quite common in North Carolina.


NOTES

1 Paper no. 6321 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agric. Res. Serv., Raleigh, NC 27607.

2 Formerly Research Assistant, now Assistant Professor, Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843; and Professor of Soil Science, Soil Science Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27607.

Received for publication March 3, 1980. Accepted for publication June 6, 1980.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
H. H. Zahran
Rhizobium-Legume Symbiosis and Nitrogen Fixation under Severe Conditions and in an Arid Climate
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 1999; 63(4): 968 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the Soil Science Society of America.