SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:925-929 (1980)
© 1980 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Blanchar, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Blanchar, R. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Blanchar, R. W.

Prediction of Diffusion Coefficients from the Electrical Conductance of Soil1

C. J. Palmer and R. W. Blanchar2

ABSTRACT

Electrical conductance may be used to predict salt movement through soil by diffusion. A two-component model was used which considers electrical conductance in soil to be a combination of a solution and a surface process. It has the form: ECa = ECw{theta}T8 + EC8 where ECa is the specific conductance of the soil, ECw is the conductance of the solution, {theta} is the volumetric moisture content, ECr is the surface conductance, and T8 is the tortuosity. It was assumed that T8 and EC8 did not vary with changes in solution concentration, and these two parameters were calculated by measuring ECa and ECw on two soil samples which differed only in electrolyte concentrations. These values were used to calculate the equivalent conductance and the diffusion coefficients for Na+ and K+.

The alternating current measurement of conductivity was frequency (f) dependent due to electrode-electrolyte interactions known as the Warburg impedance. The specific conductance was found by plotting the measured conductance against f-0.5 and extrapolating to zero. At low electrolyte concentrations, the conductivity of the soil varied as a linear function of the logarithm of frequency and this factor was evaluated before predicting diffusion coefficients from the conductance of the soil.

The diffusion coefficient for K+ in four soils with 0.0133M KCl varied from 1.64 x 10–6 to 0.50 x 10–6 cm2/sec when computed from electrical conductivity but varied from 1.84 x 10–6 to 0.33 x 10–6 cm2/sec when computed from self-diffusion. The fraction of the electrical current carried by the 0.0133M KCl in the soil solution varied from 0.85 to 0.13 and was inversely related to the cation exchange capacity. A comparison of diffusion coefficients estimated from the self-diffusion of 42K and 24Na in concentrated and dilute systems indicates good agreement except for 0.0133M K+ in the Mexico Ap soil. The data suggest that diffusion measurements made by electrical conductance are more reproducible than those made by self-diffusion, but give estimates of the diffusion coefficient that are of similar magnitude.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Missouri Agric. Exp. Stn., Columbia, Mo., Journal Series no. 8505. Approved by the Director. Supported by the Dep. of Interior, Office of Water Resour. Project A-101-Missouri, administered through the Missouri Water Resour. Cntr.

2 Research Scientist, Agriculture Canada Research Station, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1, and Professor of Agronomy, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, respectively.

Received for publication March 28, 1980. Accepted for publication June 6, 1980.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the Soil Science Society of America.