SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:689-692 (1980)
© 1980 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, E. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, E. B.

Bulk Densities of California Soils in Relation to Other Soil Properties1

E. B. Alexander2

ABSTRACT

Analyses of 721 samples from inorganic horizons of upland and alluvial soils in seven orders were utilized to develop equations for predicting soil bulk density at 1/3-bar water content. The minimum standard errors of estimate (0.14 g cm–3, r2 = 0.723, for upland soils and 0.11 g cm–3, r2 = 0.672, for alluvial soils) were obtained with functions of organic carbon content, 15-bar water content, the ratio of 15-bar water to clay, silt and sand contents, parent material, calcium carbonate equivalent, mean soil horizon depth, and for alluvial soils, soil drainage class too. Functions of electrical conductivity of saturation extract and, for alluvial soils, mean soil horizon depth did not lower the standard errors of estimate (SE) further when added to this list. Organic C content (OC) alone predicts the bulk densities (DB) of upland soils with a SE of 0.19 g cm–3 (r2 = 0.462): DB = 1.66 – 0.308 · OC0.5.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Forest Service, USDA, 630 Snasome St., San Francisco, CA 94111.

2 Soil Scientist, Watershed Management Staff.

Received for publication August 17, 1979. Accepted for publication March 31, 1980.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
N. Volland-Tuduri, A. Bruand, M. Brossard, L. C. Balbino, M. I. L. de Oliveira, and E. de Souza Martins
Mass Proportion of Microaggregates and Bulk Density in a Brazilian Clayey Oxisol
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2005; 69(5): 1559 - 1564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
B. De Vos, M. Van Meirvenne, P. Quataert, J. Deckers, and B. Muys
Predictive Quality of Pedotransfer Functions for Estimating Bulk Density of Forest Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2005; 69(2): 500 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F.G. Calhoun, N.E. Smeck, B.L. Slater, J.M. Bigham, and G.F. Hall
Predicting bulk density of Ohio Soils from Morphology, Genetic Principles, and Laboratory Characterization Data
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2001; 65(3): 811 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the Soil Science Society of America.