SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:13-16 (1980)
© 1980 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fritton, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Martsolf, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fritton, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Martsolf, J. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fritton, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Martsolf, J. D.

Soil Heat Flow under an Orchard Heater1

D. D. Fritton and J. D. Martsolf2

ABSTRACT

Soil heat flux measurements were made under and near an auto clean stack orchard heater to estimate the amount of energy being lost. Heat flux plates were buried at the 5-cm depth at 0, 50, and 100 cm from the heater center. The heat flux plate measurements were corrected for heat stored in the upper 5-cm of soil using temperatures measured by four thermocouples in series at depths of 0.0, 2.5, 5.0, 9.0, and 27.0 cm at each location and for water content and bulk density data. The resulting surface heat flux data were spatially averaged over a 100-cm radius circle around the heater. Soil surface temperatures under the heater fluctuated between 232° and 288°C during the heating interval. Soil temperatures at depths > 2.5 cm under the heater did not exceed 75°C. Surface soil temperatures at the 50- and 100-cm distances from the heater center rose from 4.4° and 4.5°C to 18.5° and 8.3°C, respectively. The spatial average soil heat flux increased rapidly to 82 mW/cm2 and then rapidly decreased and fluctuated around 13 mW/cm2 for the majority of the 39-min heating interval. This energy represents 2% of the total energy portion of the heater output. It was concluded that the energy absorbed by the soil was not effective in frost protection and should be conserved.


NOTES

1 Paper no. 5742 of the Journal Series of the Pennsylvania Agric. Exp. Stn. Supported by Northeast Regional Project NE-48. Authorized for publication May 15, 1979.

2 Associate Professor of Soil Physics and former Professor of Microclimatology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802. The junior author is presently Professor of Climatology, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.

Received for publication May 31, 1979. Accepted for publication August 27, 1979.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the Soil Science Society of America.