SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:1181-1184 (1979)
© 1979 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keisling, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mullinix, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Keisling, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mullinix, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Keisling, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mullinix, B.

Statistical Considerations for Evaluating Micronutrient Tests1

T. C. Keisling and Ben Mullinix2

ABSTRACT

For the purposes of making recommendations, micronutrient soil or tissue tests are basically classification procedures. The empirical test variable usually groups samples into three areas, i.e. a group containing mostly samples with no micronutrient problems, a second group containing mostly samples with the micronutrient problems, and a third group containing samples both with and without micronutrient problems. The third group described above can be thought of as occurring at a "transition zone" where the correct status of a sample is unidentifiable by the micronutrient test. Statistical methods using an interaction Chi-Square are presented for identifying the boundaries of the "transition zone."

It is proposed that a micronutrient test be evaluated in terms of the proportion of successful recommendations. A successful recommendation results when the proper status of a sample is identified by the test. Under the assumption of random sampling from a stable population, the above evaluation scheme follows a binomial distribution. The computation of variances and confidence intervals is shown and discussed for the proportion of successful recommendations. A statistically valid method for comparing different empirical tests, such as extracting solutions, is shown and contrasted to previously used methods.


NOTES

1 Joint contribution of Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. and the University of Georgia.

2 Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University Agricultural Research & Extension Center, Overton, Texas 75684, and Statistician, Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, Georgia 31794. The senior author is now Assistant Professor, Dept. of Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, located at the Southeast Research & Extension Center, P. O. Box 3508, Monticello, AR 71655.

Received for publication November 30, 1978. Accepted for publication July 25, 1979.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1979 by the Soil Science Society of America.