SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:819-820 (1979)
© 1979 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Blevins, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Blevins, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Blevins, R. L.

Soil Water in Coarse Fragments1

Carolyn T. Hanson and R. L. Blevins2

ABSTRACT

The amount of availability of water contained in coarse fragments is often considered to be negligible, but may in fact play an important role in the water relations of soils containing numerous coarse fragments. The objective of this study was to measure the availability of water contained in two contrasting types and several size fractions of fragments. Field capacity, –15 bar potential, and wilting point (WP) measured by plant extractions were made on sandstone fragments from the surface layers of Cutshin soil and shale fragments from a Colyer soil. The sandstone fragments contained about 11% available water by volume, and the shaly fragments contained 23% available water by volume based on WP measurements by plant removal in the greenhouse. The –15 bar potential determined in the laboratory compared closely with WP measured by plant removal for the sandstone fragments, but the –15 bar potential indicated higher levels of moisture retained in the shale fragments than WP as determined in the greenhouse.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546. Published with approval of the Director of Kentucky Agric. Exp. Stn. as Journal Article no. 78-3-206.

2 Graduate Research Assistant and Associate Professor of Agronomy, respectively.

Received for publication November 29, 1978. Accepted for publication April 9, 1979.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
K. Vanderlinden, J. V. Giraldez, and M. Van Meirvenne
Soil Water-Holding Capacity Assessment in Terms of the Average Annual Water Balance in Southern Spain
Vadose Zone J., May 12, 2005; 4(2): 317 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
T. J. Sauer and S. D. Logsdon
Hydraulic and Physical Properties of Stony Soils in a Small Watershed
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2002; 66(6): 1947 - 1956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. Brouwer and H. Anderson
Water Holding Capacity of Ironstone Gravel in a Typic Plinthoxeralf in Southeast Australia
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2000; 64(5): 1603 - 1608.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1979 by the Soil Science Society of America.