SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:765-768 (1979)
© 1979 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gasperi-Mago, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Troeh, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gasperi-Mago, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Troeh, F. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gasperi-Mago, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Troeh, F. R.

Microbial Effects on Soil Erodibility1

Rafael Ricardo Gasperi-Mago and Frederick R. Troeh2

ABSTRACT

This study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of three microbial species on soil erodibility. Sterilized Ames (a Typic Albaqualf) and Nicollet (an Aquic Hapludoll) soils were inoculated with species of Pseudomonas, Streptomyces, and Penicillium. After 15 days of incubation, both treated and untreated soils were subjected to artificial rainfall to measure their erodibility. The Ames soil averaged 23% more runoff and 34% more sediment in the runoff than Nicollet, but 2.25 times as much Nicollet soil as Ames soil was caught on splashboards. Soil loss from sterile soil was more than from any other treatment, and that from the fungal treatment was the least. The unsterilized soil had runoff and erosion approximately equal to the average of the bacterial, actinomycetes, and fungal treatments used. The results show that all of the microbial treatments used had significant positive effects on erosion resistance and that the Penicillium sp. had the strongest effect.


NOTES

1 Journal Paper J-9291 of the Iowa Agric. & Home Econ. Exp. Stn., Ames, Ia 50011. Project 2134. Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy.

2 Formerly graduate student, Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., and now Assistant Professor, Universidad Centro Occidental, Maracay, Venezuela; and Professor, Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, Iowa, respectively.

Received for publication September 11, 1978. Accepted for publication March 7, 1979.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
R.M. Cruse, R. Mier, and C.W. Mize
Surface Residue Effects on Erosion of Thawing Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2001; 65(1): 178 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1979 by the Soil Science Society of America.