SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:736-740 (1979)
© 1979 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mugwira, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Elgawhary, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mugwira, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Elgawhary, S. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mugwira, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Elgawhary, S. M.

Aluminum Accumulation and Tolerance of Triticale and Wheat in Relation to Root Cation Exchange Capacity1

L. M. Mugwira and S. M. Elgawhary2

ABSTRACT

Since plant characteristics associated with Al tolerance vary from one species to another, the objective this study was to relate Al tolerance, Al accumulation, root Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), and exchangeable Al in triticale (X Triticosecale, Witt Mack) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ten cultivars of the two species were grown in nutrient solutions with 0 or 6 ppm Al added. The solutions were adjusted to pH 4.8 either at transplanting or daily during plant growth. Aluminum accumulation and displacement by Ca and K from roots exposed to Al for up to 24 hours were also determined. With the solution pH adjusted only at transplanting, the relative root lengths (Al/no Al) indicated that the order of Al tolerance was 6TA 298 and 6TA 131 > 6TA 385 > 6TA 203 triticale and Atlas 66 > Thorne and Seneca > Monon > Redcoat and Arthur wheats. Similar Al tolerance ratings were obtained when solutions were adjusted daily to pH 4.8. Correlation coefficients between relative root lengths and root Al concentrations were –0.93** and –0.90** for triticale and –0.85** and –0.063 for wheat, respectively with pH unadjusted and pH adjusted. Correlation coefficients between plant-induced pH values and root Al concentrations were –0.19 for triticale and –0.79** for wheat. The root CEC values were generally lower in Al-tolerant than Al-sensitive cultivars. The results also suggested that the CEC of roots may be a factor in controlling Al absorption in the first 6 hr of plant exposure before the exchange sites are Al-saturated at longer periods.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dept. of Natural Resource & Environmental Studies, Alabama A&M Univ., Normal, AL 35762. This work was supported by USDA, CSRS Grant no. 516-15-62 and 701-15-02C.

2 Associate Professor, Alabama A&M Univ., Normal, AL 35762, and Visiting Senior Research Scientist, U. S. Army Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, N.H.

Received for publication November 25, 1977. Accepted for publication April 23, 1979.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Degenhardt, P. B. Larsen, S. H. Howell, and L. V. Kochian
Aluminum Resistance in the Arabidopsis Mutant alr-104 Is Caused by an Aluminum-Induced Increase in Rhizosphere pH
Plant Physiology, May 1, 1998; 117(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1979 by the Soil Science Society of America.